Montgomery leaves Cal

Posted by Alex | April 8, 2008 at 8:15 am | In Players/Alumni, Quarterback, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Originally posted on March 18: Jonathan Okanes over at BearTalk reports that James Montgomery is leaving Cal. At one point, Montgomery was listed as the starting running back for the 2008 Bears offense. Fortunately, the Bears have plenty of depth at running back though it is highly untested.

EDIT by ERIC 3/27: Walk-on QB Bryan Van Meter has decided to leave the team to try rugby. Van Meter would likely have been a backup behind (in no particular order) Kevin Riley, Nate Longshore, and redshirt freshman Brock Mansion.

EDIT by ERIC 4/1: More on Montgomery’s situation in our Spring update.

EDIT by ERIC 4/8: Sadly, Montgomery’s hopes to become a Florida Gator did not work out — he has decided on the Cougars with a verbal commitment to Washington State. Montgomery will have to sit out one year, according to NCAA transfer rules.

Recruiting Update

Posted by Alex | December 20, 2007 at 1:10 am | In Recruiting | 6 Comments

After 2L finals, it’s time to start looking back at some football. Cal picked up a few new recruits after nearly a dozen Cal commits or prospects visited campus last weekend. All three of the prospects should add quite a bit to Cal’s class.

Jarrett Sparks is a WR from Merced who measures in at 6′3″ and 215 lbs with a 4.5 40. Big, tall, and fast. Should be good for us. Sparks is rated as a 3 star recruit by scout.com and a 4 star recruit by rivals.com.

L.J. Washington is a WR from Stockton who measures in at 6′0″ and 180 lbs with a 4.45 40. Also a bigger receiver, though also a bit lighter than Sparks. Washington is rated as a 2 star recruit by scout.com. Apparently Washington and Sparks competed for the most receiving yards this past year in the Central Section. It should be exciting to watch these two WRs play together in the coming years.

Kamaron Yancy is a CB coming out of Pierce College, originally from Fairfax High School. He measures 5′11″ and 185 lbs with a 4.4 40. He is a bit of an older guy, having graduated high school in 2002. At that time, he played in the Cali-Florida Bowl showing that he had a promising career in front of him. However, he chose to stay at home and work for a few years while his parents went through marital problems. This to me shows lots of maturity which will hopefully carry over to the playing field. He has 3 years to play 3 years.

4 star WR commits to Cal

Posted by Alex | October 15, 2007 at 8:58 am | In Recruiting | 3 Comments

The news out of the weekend isn’t all bad. As a consolation, 4-star wideout Marvin Jones committed to Cal over the weekend after taking in the Cal-OSU game. Scout.com reports that Jones met with Tedford after the game and gave his verbal commitment. Scout and Rivals.com list Jones as a 4-star recruit, with Rivals listing Jones as one of their top 100 prospects in the nation. On an amusing note, Jones chose Cal over Oregon partially because of the amount of rain in Oregon.

This is our first huge commitment of the year and should be great for the team. Jones is 6′2″ and 180 lbs, while running a 4.5 40. He gives us another big and fast receiver who could potentially play as a true freshman next year. Matching him up with Nyan Boateng should keep the Cal receiving corp from a dropoff after this year’s superstars graduate or head to the NFL.

Memorial Stadium a scary place for opponents?

Posted by Alex | October 1, 2007 at 1:15 pm | In Uncategorized | 4 Comments

According to ESPN’s Bruce Feldman, Cal’s Memorial Stadium is the 10th scariest place to play in the nation.

10. Cal, Memorial Stadium
Autzen Stadium is probably noisier than Cal’s Memorial Stadium, but there is a little magic to this quirky place. Since 2003, the Bears have faced five ranked teams at home and knocked off four, including an upset of USC in 2003 by a then-unranked Cal squad. Of course, Jeff Tedford deserves plenty of credit for that, too.

This mention shows Cal’s growing home field advantage. Though not normally mentioned as a difficult place to visiting teams to play, Cal continues to have great home seasons each year. Hopefully that trend continues this season with USC at home.

Cal picks up Arizona DB

Posted by Alex | September 19, 2007 at 1:11 pm | In Recruiting | 2 Comments

Marc Anthony, a DB out of Arizona has committed to the Bears.  He is a 6′0″ 185 lbs player who primarily plays cornerback. Rated as a 3 star recruit by Scout.com and as a 4 star recruit by Rivals, he is a great get for the Bears.

Anthony is a big cornerback and has the ability to compete physically against the big receivers in the Pac-10.  Yet, he retains enough speed (4.5 40) to keep up with the speed of the conference.  Also, his commitment shows the continually lengthening arms of Cal’s recruiting as Tedford again reaches into another state to pick up a top recruit.  Something interesting of note is that Anthony is a cousin of true freshman DE Cameron Jordan.

Anthony will come in and improve Cal’s young DB corps which already looks quite solid.

The law in the restraining order ruling

Posted by Alex | September 13, 2007 at 10:56 pm | In Facilities | 6 Comments

(Note: I am a second year law student. By no means am I saying that I am a full expert on the law or that I am completely accurate. It means that I know some about the law, and that I have studied injunctions and restraining orders which are along the lines of what Cal has requested against the tree-sitters. This is just my interpretation of the events.)

On Wednesday, a judge denied Cal’s request to remove the tree protesters. What makes this case interesting is that Cal requested quick action, which makes the standards of winning the immediate injunction a bit more difficult for Cal. From what I can gather from the Chronicle article and from the Scout.com article, Cal wanted an immediate injunction because propane tanks have been spotted up in the trees for cooking purposes, and there have been human excrement spills from the trees. This is based off a broader request for an injunction to remove the protesters.

To get an injunction immediately, Cal has to show that its case is much stronger than the protesters’ case. This is determined by comparing four factors on a sliding scale basis. This means that if one factor is very strong, and the other factors are mediocre, the one strong factor will win out. If all are factors not really in favor of either side, then there will probably not be an injunction granted. The factors are:

    1. The applicant is likely to be successful on the merits of the case

    2. The applicant will suffer irreparable harm without the injunction

    3. The harm to the opposing party (protesters) from the injunction is outweighed by the harm to the applicant without the injunction (balancing of the harms)

    4. That public interest favors the injunction.

I will try to give my own analysis and then compare against the court’s ruling.

On factor 1, it seems as if Cal has a good chance of winning an injunction based off of the merits of its case. For one, it is clearly Cal property that the protesters are on. Also, there is a health and safety issue involved with with the propane tanks and the human excrement falling from the trees. From my perspective, Cal should have no problem winning the overall injunction and thus are likely to be successful on the merits of its case.

2. This is a weak one for Cal. Cal’s strongest claim that they will suffer irreparable harm is that there will be a fire caused by the propane tanks and that the trees will burn down. However, the likelihood of this seems pretty slim as the protesters clearly want the trees to remain. Plus, Cal does want to remove the trees, so will it really be harm to them if the trees burn down? Kind of… only if there is damage elsewhere.

3. This is the one that probably wins it for the protesters. They have a much greater chance of being harmed by an immediate injunction than does Cal if an injunction if not granted. The protesters currently are living in the trees. Their lives and their possessions are there, and they fear that if they abandon the trees, Cal will immediately cut them down. While I am not saying that I believe that Cal would do so, the protesters do believe it. If the trees are indeed cut down, then the protesters will have lost all that they have been fighting for, hence causing great harm to them. Cal on the other hand, would have the fear of fire in the trees for an extra month. Seems like the protesters clearly win this one.

4. Public interest in this case is pretty split. There is the City of Berkeley and the protester supporters that want the protest to continue in the trees. On the other hand, there is Cal and its students fighting to take the protesters out of the trees… pretty much a wash.

After considering the four different factors, it seems like a close split. Cal clearly wins factor 1, but the protesters clearly win factor 3. The other 2 factors are pretty much neutral. With a pretty even split, the court probably chooses to side on the conservative side and to let the status quo stand.

Hence, though it seems unfair that Cal cannot have court approval to remove the protesters from the trees, it may not be just a bias against Cal; it is probably well-rooted in law. Chances are at the actual trial coming up in October, Cal will win an injunction against protesters and will be able to remove them with full court support. Even now, Cal has the law on its side as the protesters are on Cal property. However, with Cal seeking every peaceful measure involved, it will simply have to wait another month for the court injunction.

The court itself does say that Cal has a decent chance of winning its case. However, it simply did not show enough of a danger from fire or from the human excrement. As a result, the protesters are not removed immediately. Seems spot on to me.

So why does this neutrality tilt towards the protesters? This tilt is to protect their due process rights to be heard. Basically Cal is asking for an injunction against the protesters without their side being fully prepared to argue their case. This would bypass their due process rights. To justify the bypassing of the protesters’ rights, Cal must show an overwhelming case of harm, which it simply does not have.

Reed to transfer

Posted by Alex | August 29, 2007 at 11:02 pm | In Quarterback | 3 Comments

Kyle Reed is looking to transfer after losing the backup QB battle to Kevin Riley. Reed, a redshirt sophomore, will have 2 years to play 2 years after the transfer. According to Yahoo, Reed has already contacted San Jose State.

Although this is kind of sad that Reed is giving up on winning the starting QB job in the future, there are some benefits that come from this transfer. It opens up more possibilities for QB recruits in the future, and allows Brock Mansion, Riley, and Beau Sweeney to compete for the starting QB job after Longshore leaves. This takes out a bit of the logjam at the QB position. Also, this transfer speaks volumes to Cal’s recruiting in the past couple years. Reed was a 4-star recruit coming out of high school and was an elite 11 qb. That he cannot even crack the playing field at Cal shows that our level of talent has risen tremendously since the days when Kyle Boller stepped into the starting QB position as a freshman.

Tennessee QB update

Posted by Alex | August 29, 2007 at 8:58 pm | In Uncategorized | 1 Comment

According to ESPN, Tennessee QB Erik Ainge has a broken pinky on his throwing hand. He is still expected to start for the game, with backup sophomore QB Jonathan Crompton ready to step in.

While reports show that Ainge seems to be throwing fine, it seems like a broken pinky would have a significant effect on how Ainge throws the ball. This is an unfortunate injury as it would have been good to see the Bears play the Vols at their best. The Vols will now be missing their starting RB (Larry Coker), and will be playing with a hurt QB.

College quarterbacks

Posted by Alex | July 30, 2007 at 4:18 pm | In Coaches, Quarterback | No Comments

Interesting article on espn.com talking about college quarterbacks and what it requires to be one. There are also some good quotes from Tedford talking about what he looks for in a quarterback recruit.

“But it takes a special breed to be a great quarterback, with a unique mix of attributes. This is Tedford’s five-part recruiting checklist when shopping for a QB:

1. Mental and physical toughness. “Obviously, physically, you’re going to take a pounding, and you’ve got to get up and have your team follow you. You have to be mentally tough because if you throw a couple picks, you’ve got to be tough enough to come back.” 2. Intelligence. “You’ve got to be able to understand and control the offense.” 3. Competitiveness. “We look for a guy who wants the ball in his hands with the game on the line.” 4. Escape dimension. “Not everything happens the way it’s drawn up. We want a guy who can elude the rush and make something happen when a play breaks down.” 5. Natural throwing motion. “He’s got to be able to get the ball around the field.”

Click here for the full article.

Cal lands big TE

Posted by Alex | June 5, 2007 at 9:16 am | In Recruiting | 6 Comments

Spencer Ladner (6′7″/235) has given a verbal to Cal. He comes out of Kansas City, MO and lists Cal’s reputation as the #1 public school in the nation as a primary reason for choosing Cal. He is rated as a 3 star TE by Scout.com and a 4 star recruit by Rivals.

There’s a couple reasons that this signing means a lot. First, this guy is BIG. Just for reference, Lebron James is 6′8″/250. Craig Stevens is 6′5″/254. With a year in the weight room, Ladner can be a great endzone target or a blocker in the Tedford tradition. Second, Ladner comes from Missouri. This shows that Cal’s reach on the national recruiting front has grown even further after last year’s record number of out-of-state commits. Third, this confirms that Cal’s reputation as an academic leader will continue to land some top recruits.

EDIT BY ERIC: Also, it’s noteworthy that Ladner turned down offers from traditional powerhouse schools like Michigan and Oklahoma, showing that Cal is really on its way up in terms of nationwide recruiting.

<< Previous PageNext Page >>

© 2006-08 the cal football fan Top